Panama Papers poll result reflects ethical murk
Respondents are riven regarding the release of names on the Mossack Fonseca database. With special feature audio.
A readers poll on whether people present in the database of the so-called Panama Papers should be publicly named has no clear outcome, reflecting the highly subjective reaction to the release of the information.
Passionate arguments have raged in NBR’s comments sections about the how the
Want to read more? It's easy.
Choose your best value subscription option
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
Yearly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Monthly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$44.95 / monthly
Smartphone Only Subscription
NZ$24.95 / monthly
Premium Group Membership 10 Users
NZ$350+GST / monthly
$35 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 20 Users
NZ$600+GST / monthly
$30 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 50 Users
NZ$1250+GST / monthly
$25 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 100 Users
NZ$1875+GST / monthly
$18.75 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitYearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Already have an account? Login
Nick Grant
Fri, 13 May 2016
Fri, 13 May 2016
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Panama Papers poll result reflects ethical murk
58064