OPINION: Carpet manufacturers’ spat clarifies marketers’ legal obligations
GUEST OPINION
Hot Topic
Hawke’s Bay
GUEST OPINION
Last week, the Court of Appeal made major clarifications to suppliers’ obligations under the Fair Trading Act as to the law on misleading and similar statements in ads and websites. The focus was on a wide spread challenge in marketing goods and services: headline claims in ads and
Want to read more? It's easy.
Choose your best value subscription option
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
Yearly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Monthly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$44.95 / monthly
Smartphone Only Subscription
NZ$24.95 / monthly
Premium Group Membership 10 Users
NZ$350+GST / monthly
$35 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 20 Users
NZ$600+GST / monthly
$30 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 50 Users
NZ$1250+GST / monthly
$25 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 100 Users
NZ$1875+GST / monthly
$18.75 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitYearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Already have an account? Login
Michael Wigley
Tue, 02 Sep 2014
Tue, 02 Sep 2014
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
OPINION: Carpet manufacturers’ spat clarifies marketers’ legal obligations
40972