close
MENU
Te Ao Māori
4 mins to read

No need for rushed MACA law change – former Attorney-General

Chris Finlayson KC says today’s Supreme Court ruling on the Marine and Coastal Area Act means there’s no need for the Government to be hurrying through law changes.

Former Attorney-General Chris Finlayson KC.

Key points
  • What's at stake: The Supreme Court ruled the Court of Appeal erred in easing the test for Māori to gain customary marine title (CMT), reinstating a stricter interpretation under section 58 of MACA. The Supreme Court's ruling indicates that a second judgment will follow, addressing specific claims from the individual appellants.
  • Background: The Court emphasised that MACA protects public fishing and access rights while enabling Māori to secure CMT where exclusive use and occupation under tikanga are proven. The decision addresses concerns behind the government’s proposed law changes, due to be slated next week, questioning whether further amendments to MACA are necessary.
  • Key players: Attorney-General, former Attorney-General Chris Finlayson, hapū and iwi from Te Whakatōhea, barrister Natalie Coates, Supreme Court, Court of Appeal. 

A Supreme Court ruling out today has clarified the test for Customary Marine Title under the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act balancing Māori customary rights with public interests, and makes the coalition Government’s proposed legislative changes “overkill” according to former

Want to read more? It's easy.

Choose your best value subscription option

Student

Exclusive offer for uni students studying at a New Zealand university (valued at $499).
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace

Yearly Premium Online Subscription

NZ$499.00 / yearly

Monthly Premium Online Subscription

NZ$44.95 / monthly

Smartphone Only Subscription

NZ$24.95 / monthly

Premium Group Membership 10 Users

NZ$350+GST / monthly

$35 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Premium Group Membership 20 Users

NZ$600+GST / monthly

$30 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Premium Group Membership 50 Users

NZ$1250+GST / monthly

$25 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Premium Group Membership 100 Users

NZ$1875+GST / monthly

$18.75 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Yearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace

NZ$499.00 / yearly

Already have an account? Login
Mike McRoberts Mon, 02 Dec 2024
Contact the Writer: Mike@nbr.co.nz
News tip? Question? Typo? Let us know: editor@nbr.co.nz
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Key points
  • What's at stake: The Supreme Court ruled the Court of Appeal erred in easing the test for Māori to gain customary marine title (CMT), reinstating a stricter interpretation under section 58 of MACA. The Supreme Court's ruling indicates that a second judgment will follow, addressing specific claims from the individual appellants.
  • Background: The Court emphasised that MACA protects public fishing and access rights while enabling Māori to secure CMT where exclusive use and occupation under tikanga are proven. The decision addresses concerns behind the government’s proposed law changes, due to be slated next week, questioning whether further amendments to MACA are necessary.
  • Key players: Attorney-General, former Attorney-General Chris Finlayson, hapū and iwi from Te Whakatōhea, barrister Natalie Coates, Supreme Court, Court of Appeal. 
No need for rushed MACA law change – former Attorney-General
Te Ao Māori,
106984
true