Employers entitled to get around suppression orders, Supreme Court rules
Security guard's case against university has set new precedents for employment law.
Employers now have more power when it comes to knowing about and taking action on criminal acts by their employees, following a ruling from the Supreme Court.
The precedent-setting case involved a dispute between a security guard and his employer, the University of Otago.
While employed at
Want to read more? It's easy.
Choose your best value subscription option
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
Yearly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Monthly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$44.95 / monthly
Smartphone Only Subscription
NZ$24.95 / monthly
Premium Group Membership 10 Users
NZ$350+GST / monthly
$35 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 20 Users
NZ$600+GST / monthly
$30 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 50 Users
NZ$1250+GST / monthly
$25 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 100 Users
NZ$1875+GST / monthly
$18.75 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitYearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Already have an account? Login
Campbell Gibson
Thu, 04 May 2017
Thu, 04 May 2017
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Employers entitled to get around suppression orders, Supreme Court rules
66734