Capital Letter: Supreme Court ruling on trusts and relationship property significant
The trust in question (VRPT) had been settled by Mr Clayton.
Hot Topic
Hawke’s Bay
A high-profile case on the use of discretionary trusts to thwart relationship property claims, Clayton v Clayton, has made it to the Supreme Court. Although it was settled by the parties after that court hearing, it was agreed that the court would issue a judgment in the wider public interest.
The
Want to read more? It's easy.
Choose your best value subscription option
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
Yearly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Monthly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$44.95 / monthly
Smartphone Only Subscription
NZ$24.95 / monthly
Premium Group Membership 10 Users
NZ$350+GST / monthly
$35 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 20 Users
NZ$600+GST / monthly
$30 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 50 Users
NZ$1250+GST / monthly
$25 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 100 Users
NZ$1875+GST / monthly
$18.75 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitYearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Already have an account? Login
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Capital Letter: Supreme Court ruling on trusts and relationship property significant
56819