Capital Letter: Appeal Court rules against anti-fluoridation campaigners
On the water fluoridation issue, rather than making a nationwide stand, New Zealand passes the parcel.
When faced with a decision which an “evidence-based” approach says is for the common good, but a well-organised lobby group rejects, what is a government to do? On the water fluoridation issue, rather than making a nationwide stand, New Zealand passes the parcel.
Health Minister Jonathan Coleman
Want to read more? It's easy.
Choose your best value subscription option
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
Yearly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$499.00 / yearly
NZ$399.00 / yearly
Monthly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$44.95 / monthly
Smartphone Only Subscription
NZ$24.95 / monthly
Premium Group Membership 10 Users
NZ$350+GST / monthly
$35 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 20 Users
NZ$600+GST / monthly
$30 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 50 Users
NZ$1250+GST / monthly
$25 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 100 Users
NZ$1875+GST / monthly
$18.75 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitYearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Already have an account? Login
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Capital Letter: Appeal Court rules against anti-fluoridation campaigners
62121