$1.2 million for a basic Council website is too much
David Farrar on the Christchurch City Council's Web site.
Hot Topic
Hawke’s Bay
Stuff reports:
The Christchurch City Council has spent $1.2 million upgrading its “outdated” website.
The revamp included new software, new content and staff training and took three and a half months. The site was last overhauled in 2009 and that version ran on systems that would not be supported past this month.
The $1.2m spend came out of the council’s IT capital budget for this financial year.
The director of a Christchurch web development company said the total cost was a surprise.
“That takes my breath away. You vaguely hear of those sorts of number getting thrown around. I’m struggling to get my head around where that cost would come from.”
The director, who asked to remain anonymous as his company did web development work for the council, said parts of the design, such as the user elements for rates and dog registration, were quite technical, making precise cost estimates difficult.
“[But] we’d have happily done the job for half that and probably, I believe, still arrived at the same result.”
$1.2 million is a huge figure. If they had designed a website where you could interact online with the Council in every area, that sort of price might be justified, but it is primarily just a static website.
As an example I went to their services section to see what could I do online. Under burials, there is no online form to book one in. You download a pdf, print it out, then have to scan it back in and e-mail it to them.
Other services which you can’t do online are:
- Dog registration
- Tenancy application
- Report to noise control
Incredible that they spend $1.2 million and can’t even convert some pdf forms into online forms.
Political commentator David Farrar posts at Kiwiblog.
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
$1.2 million for a basic Council website is too much
50067