Mercury’s $6m tax question
IRD had drawn a distinction between geothermal and hydroelectric assets.
Victoria Young
Mon, 17 Jun 2019
Hot Topic
Hawke’s Bay
When is a structure a building and not plant?
It might be a technical tax question but it is a $6 million one before Justice Anne Hinton in the High Court at Auckland this week.
Mercury NZ has raised the issue following a 2011 tax change by Inland Revenue, which disallowed tax deductions
Want to read more? It's easy.
Choose your best value subscription option
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
Yearly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Monthly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$44.95 / monthly
Smartphone Only Subscription
NZ$24.95 / monthly
Premium Group Membership 10 Users
NZ$350+GST / monthly
$35 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 20 Users
NZ$600+GST / monthly
$30 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 50 Users
NZ$1250+GST / monthly
$25 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 100 Users
NZ$1875+GST / monthly
$18.75 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitYearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Already have an account? Login
Victoria Young
Mon, 17 Jun 2019
Contact the Writer: victoria@nbr.co.nz
News tip? Question? Typo? Let us know: editor@nbr.co.nz
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Mercury’s $6m tax question
Law,
79734